Krugman vs. Austria
The plenary chamber of the Austrian parliament was packed by 9:00 on Apr. 21, just like the stands for the general public in anticipation of ÖVP Finance Minister Josef Pröll’s 63-minute presentation of the budget.
At 9:05, Pröll rose from his seat to deliver what was expected to be his most important speech of his career so far, presenting the budgets for 2009 and 2010, which was broadcasted live by ORF Austrian Television.
Austria, along with much of the world, is in the worst economic crisis in recent memory and the financial outlook is gloomy. The country’s national debt will increase by 3.5% in 2009 and 4.7% in 2010, well above the permitted Maastricht level of 3%. Consequently, the total national debt will reach an alarming 78.5% of Austria’s GDP by 2013, up from 62.5% in 2008. The bank rescue package (Vienna Review reported, April 2009) weighs with €9.3 billion heavily (2009).
Economic Minister Reinhold Mitterlehner added in Der Standard of Apr. 25 that in order to consolidate the budget in the years to come “we also need new sources of income.” In other words, raise more taxes as the estimated tax income for the state drops by €4.5 billion in 2010.
But Pröll in his budget speech seemed eager to rise to the occasion, perhaps hoping to imitate U.S. President Barack Obama’s rhetorical skills.
“In presenting this budget today, the hour of truth is upon us,” Pröll intoned. “And this budget is a clear declaration of war against the [economic] crisis.”
But Pröll is by no means an eloquent speaker. His delivery was uninspiring, so much as that only the members of his party are enthused to applause, and as journalists followed along the printed version of the speech, they noted some of the more amusing interjections of the opposition.Most members of the majority Social Democrats (SPÖ) – Pröll’s senior coalition partner – listened with apparent apathy. After all, this was essentially a conservative-crafted budget intended to combat a serious financial and economic crisis, and left little room to reward their own electorate.
Just a week earlier, Princeton University economics professor and 2008 Nobel Prize Laureate Paul Krugman, who writes a bi-weekly column for the New York Times, gave rise to speculation on whether Europe’s fourth-richest country – in Pröll’s own definition of income per capita – might in fact be on the brink of bankruptcy.
Speaking at the Foreign Press Club in New York on Apr. 13, Krugman revived the debate on the impact of the financial crisis on Austrian banks, because of their strong engagement in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE).
In the question period, Krugman was asked about Austrian banks’ high exposure to Eastern Europe. Austrian banks have more than U.S. $200 billion of exposure to Eastern Europe, roughly 70% of the Austrian GDP – not including Bank Austria (UniCredit) and Hypo Alpe Adria (Hypo Group) that are foreign-owned. Was there a chance this might lead the country into bankruptcy? Krugman responded pointedly:
“Now it’s a tiny one, it’s Iceland but that just shows that it can happen, even to advanced countries. Ireland looks pretty bad because of large financial exposure. And Austria would probably be my third candidate in those leads.”
His provocative remarks sparked high-profile responses and anger in Austria.
“Absolutely absurd,” Pröll responded on Austrian Television on Apr. 15. There was no need for “unqualified statements based on inadequate information, which can put a country under massive pressure if they are uttered carelessly.”
Besides, Austria’s high lending exposures in the CEE area has to be set against savings, Pröll clarified, with deposits of some 85% of the €200 billion owed.
The head of the Austrian Chamber of Commerce, Christoph Leitl, was right behind him. In Der Standard, the same day, Leitl stressed that Austria’s AAA rating was in no danger, which several rating agencies recently confirmed, but emphasized that “erroneous statements could lead to higher risk premiums on Austrian bonds. That really damages Austria.”
“It seems that I have reached the stage where I create a stir by saying the obvious,” Krugman responded in his blog two days later; and over 100 comments followed within a few hours.
Krugman’s statement has revived a debate of the past months when media reports, such as the Austrian news magazine Profil, asked in mid-February: ‘Is Austria going bankrupt?’
But in Vienna, at least, the tangible evidence just doesn’t seem to be there.
“It is a palpable presence in people’s everyday lives [in Central and Eastern Europe], as it is in America,” said Robert Graffam of Darby Investments, a private equity firm in Vienna that specializes in CEE. “In Austria, somehow, you don’t feel that.”
Indeed, the severe financial troubles of Austria’s neighbors highlight the huge investment Austrian banks had made since the 1990s in the CEE countries.
They are the most exposed in the area, led by Raiffeisen with 54% of its risk-weighted assets, and Erste Bank Group with 38%.
Evidently Finance Minister Josef Pröll set off for a ‘face-saving’ trip to Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia and the Ukraine in mid-February promoting the Austrian government’s proposal for a financial stability pact for the CEE countries.
However, Pröll’s goodwill tour sparked fresh concerns in the Austrian financial sector.
On Feb. 17, the Romanian business online magazine Wall-Street was headlined: ‘Romania Could Drive Austria to a Meltdown.’
At the same time, a report by Der Standard back home estimated that even a 10% default of CEE loans could lead to a collapse of the Austrian financial sector. The figures of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) confirmed estimates of at least 10% bail-out of bad loans.
Not surprisingly, the government’s rescue plan failed to convince the other EU member-states, as it seemed to be motivated only by Austrian self-interest.
Thus, while Krugman’s comment may be exaggerated, as bankruptcy seems unlikely in Austria at this stage, he still made a valuable point: Austria should not underestimate the effect a widespread financial collapse of financial institutions inevitably has when the CEE countries are not stabilized.
If this aspect of the financial crisis is mishandled, predicted The Daily Telegraph columnist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard on Feb. 15, it could mean “a debacle [that is] big enough to shatter the fragile banking systems of Western Europe and set off round two of our financial Götterdämmerung.”
Austria would then certainly play the leading role.





Comments
Is Austria going Bank-Erupt???
Is Austria going Bank-Erupt??
Oi gevault!! Only if you imagine Austria going bankrupt will it happen!! That's because I want you to think you are going bankrupt in Austria. Why?? Oi gevault, I tell you!! Because you need the gelt I keep in the vault, oi gevault!! That's why!
Now, see here:
Paul Krugman says that I am correct. You see why??
You need not think you all are going bankrupt in Austria.
Just because Paul Krugman, whose cousin is the Wechsler (meaning the Money Changer) wants to sell you some trillions of Euros, or worse -- Dollnars, as Salvador Dali called them -- which were freshly printed/minted by the European-American-UK-ish Federal Reserve Boys and Girls Group.
So, even if you think I am only joking around, the announcement made by me here is more accurate than what Krugman is trying to pull the wool over your eyes because that is the way the World Bankers like to pull the strings and thereby profit from such monetary moves. They do it every 3 decades or so, or have we not noticed. Well, it is not only the Krugmans and their ilk, but it certainly helps to be a Banker, or a cousin of one, to tell you one does not need one. So, that's about the truth of it.
Saiful RimkeitSanta Rosa, California
Bankers' Hubris
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2002/08/19/Interview-Austrian-bankers-r...
http://samvak.tripod.com/pp169.html
"Q: Many Austrian banks have aggressively spread to Central Europe - notably the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Croatia, and Slovenia. Do you think it is a wise long term strategy? The region is in transition and its fortunes change daily. Poland has switched from prosperity to depression in less than 7 years. Aren't you concerned that Austrian banks are actually importing instability into their balance sheets?
A: The move by the Austrian banks into central and eastern Europe is a very good niche market growth strategy. Austrian banks lost a lot of money in the UK, the USA, and in other parts of the world - but were very risk-conscious in central and eastern Europe, where, today, they generate high margins. In the years to come, this will be a strongly growing region. Entering these markets was a very positive decision.
Q: Austria's banks are small by international standards. Do you foresee additional consolidation or purchases by foreign banks, possibly German?
A: I am convinced that there will be additional domestic consolidation coupled with some foreign purchases. The three big German banks - HVB, Bayerische Landesbank, and Deutsche Bank - are already present in Austria.
Q: In 1931, the collapse of Creditanstalt in Vienna triggered a global depression. The markets are again in turmoil, the global economy is stagnant, and trade protectionism is increasing. Can you compare the two periods?
A: Thank you for the honor of triggering a global recession, but Creditanstalt was too small to do so. In my view, you cannot compare the markets today and in 1931. Financial skills and organizations are much more developed today. Social systems are much more secure than in the 1930's."
Sam Vaknin
palma@unet.com.mk
+38970-565488
Response to Bankers' Hubris
Thank you very much for your comment and interview excerpt. I have seen some of your writing on that issue (from 2007) recently, and I also found the statement given by Wolfgang Christl striking indeed.
What I should add here is the following: Austrian politics and academic circles still refer to Krugman's comment with anger, though Krugman is not mentioned by name - as I experienced at a conference on Europe and Public Opinion here in Vienna. The tone is like Josef Pröll above: Those who brought this economic and financial crisis upon us are now criticizing the success of our banks in the CEE countries. Austrian politics and business seem to ignore that Paul Krugman neither represents (or represented) the previous or current U.S. Administrations, and certainly should not be reduced to the same level as the political actors that failed to set up and maintain the regulatory framework to prevent such a severe financial crisis.
I would also like to add, that Krugman's statement on Apr. 13 was in response to a question by an Austrian journalist, following the inner-Austrian debate and speculation in the Austrian media of the previous months on whether Austria is bankrupt. Additionally, Pröll's own trip to some of the CEE countries in February 2009 gave more reasons to be concerned, not only because of the destinations he chose, but the team and staff that accompanied him, which clearly showed the concerns for the Austrian banking sector. Something that was also widely reported and analyzed at the time in Austria.
So, why did Krugman's comment - even these days - cause such an outcry? A valid question for those who do not experience the debate within Austria. Krugman's comment - as he so pointedly said in his blog - was certainly not news in April 2009. But these kind of debates, Austrian politics indicates (and not for the first time), are not intended for the outside world as they shake the foundations of the convenient Austrian viewpoint that what is happening around us has little to do with us.
Matthias Wurz
The Vienna Review